Hierarchy of Evidence & Literature Screening
To maintain the highest level of factual accuracy across our thematic dossiers, our editorial board follows a defined evidence hierarchy:
| Evidence Level | Documentary Source Category | Application in Publications |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 (Primary) | Systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in peer-reviewed scientific journals | Foundation for all nutritional and physiological statements |
| Level 2 (Secondary) | Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective human cohort studies | Mechanistic validation of metabolic and athletic outcomes |
| Level 3 (Regional & Heritage) | Regional agronomic monographs, historical herbals, and French INRAE/CNRS records | Documentation of Pyrenean flora and culinary heritage traditions |
Peer-Review & Verification Workflow
Every manuscript undergoes a 4-step verification pathway before publication:
- Primary Research & Synthesis: Authors compile data from primary academic databases with complete DOI citations.
- Expert Peer Review: A subject-matter specialist (nutritionist or exercise physiologist) reviews claims against current scientific consensus.
- Neutrality & Conflict Audit: Removal of commercial promotion or unverified wellness claims.
- Periodic Review: Annual review cycles to update monographs as new scientific evidence is published.
Independence & Conflict-of-Interest Policy
CA RESTAURATION accepts no sponsorships or financial contributions from commercial dietary supplement manufacturers or pharmaceutical brands. Our analyses remain strictly objective and evidence-based.
Corrections & Scientific Feedback
Scientific understanding continually evolves. If you identify an inaccuracy or wish to submit recent published studies that refine an existing dossier, please contact our research secretariat at: [email protected]. All feedback is reviewed thoroughly.